![]() But apple’s decision to avoid AMD and go it alone with their M1 predates the pandemic, so obviously the pandemic was not a causal factor in these decisions. Sure the pandemic is screwing over everybody, which would clearly impact decisions made today. Also AMD has to contract most of their fab capacity for the console SoCs, and given how most of the high end Ryzen parts are MIA, I don’t know if AMD can scale production as easily as you assume, but there’s also the factor of the pandemic. they have been the launch/risk partner of the past few nodes, by the time AMD gets to 5nm, Apple will have been on it for 1 year. Given the nature of their contracts, Apple has a higher priority within TSMC (i.e. Using the same fab is only part of the equation. ![]() I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that apple’s x86 contracts give intel exclusivity though. It’s kind of surprising that apple doesn’t given that AMD has the most powerful CPUs on the market today. I’m not privy to why apple does anything, but I think apple would have pleased a lot of users offering AMD systems. Assuming apple discontinues all x86 laptops, the only remaining x86 systems will be too unaffordable for everyday consumers, making M1 the only practical choice for them. An entry level system starts at $6k, those who want good specs need to shell out $10k-15k. My prediction was that apple would continue x86 in the form of macpro, but would keep it priced out of the market for normal consumers. When Apple stops producing Intel Macs, as I’ve no doubt they will, then the idea that there will only be one more version would certainly fit with Apple’s past track record. Apple are still producing Intel Macs at this point in time, so this speculation doesn’t quite make sense. A big hit for PowerPC Mac and Mac OS 9 users, for sure.Ĭitation needed. Single individuals – or even a small group of people – simply cannot maintain a modern web browser, let alone two, let alone on two outdated platforms. It’s an inevitable consequence of just how complex the web and web browsers have become. There is also the matter of several major security issues with it that I have been unable to resolve without seriously gutting the browser, and as a result of all of those factors I haven’t done an official release of Classilla since 9.3.3 in 2014. I did a lot of work on this in the early days and I think I can say unequivocally it is now far more compatible than its predecessor WaMCoM was, but the Web moves faster than a solo developer and the TLS apocalypse has rendered all old browsers equal by simply chopping everyone’s legs off at once. I’ve lately regretted how neglected Classilla has been, largely because of TenFourFox, and (similar to TenFourFox in kind if not degree) the sheer enormity of the work necessary to bring it up to modern standards. Classilla is a modern-ish browser for Mac OS 9 and 8.6.Īn apology is owed to the classic Mac users who depend on Classilla as the only vaguely recent browser on Mac OS 9 (and 8.6). Today is a one-two punch, because Classilla, too, is calling it quits. TenFourFox FPR32 will be the last official feature parity release of TenFourFox. ![]() I’ve been mulling TenFourFox’s future for awhile now in light of certain feature needs that are far bigger than a single primary developer can reasonably embark upon, and recent unexpected changes to my employment, plus other demands on my time, have unfortunately accelerated this decision. TenFourFox, the browser developed specifically to give PowerPC Mac users a modern browser, is the first. ![]() Two browsers for old Mac OS X and classic Mac OS releases, developed by the same developer, are shutting down.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |